Friday, December 4, 2009

CLIMATEGATE: an inconvenient truth

Jon Stewart Talks Climategate

UPDATE 10 December 2009

At last some of the real scientists are being heard above the clammer of politicians and climate $peculators trying to save their collective arses from the impending doom.

Once respected scientist has a solution...

From Australia's ABC

Kill the IPCC

Bob Carter is a geologist from James Cook University, Queensland. He is a palaeontologist, stratigrapher, marine geologist and environmental scientist with more than thirty years professional experience.

...the study of climate change, under the aegis of "dangerous global warming caused by human carbon dioxide emissions," has long since been captured by the small group of well connected, well networked and well funded atmospheric scientists and computer modellers who advise the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and whose nearly every utterance confirms their ignorance of the true course of climate history and change on our planet - a topic that is the domain of geologists, not meteorologists and computer jockeys.

However, the stately progress that the IPCC was making towards achieving international action at the COP15 climate conference against carbon dioxide, an environmentally beneficial trace gas, has been shattered by the Climategate affair.

The Climategate files have demonstrated the scientific malfeasance of an influential and internationally well networked segment of the climate research community. A small group of scientists and computer modellers - with the aid of an enormous supporting cast of environmental activists and organisations, self-interested business groups, and crusading journalists - have managed to turn the global warming issue (which in 1990 was an entirely sensible matter to have raised) into the scientific scam of the century, if not the biggest ever.

UPDATE 8 December 2009

Wow, mainstream media is really starting to pick up on Climategate, far more interesting and important that who Tiger Woods penis has been entertaining.

These UN crooks have also censored any other climate scientist who wanted to publish research that disagreed with the CRU. That's a criminal offence in many countries and those who have been harmed by the crooks are getting lawyered up.

You can be sure the Politicians in the Copenhagen climate talkfest the next 2 weeks will achieve absolutely nothing, that's what they do best.

Except agree that there needs to be more taxes from everybody else, so they can do it again.

Get your Climategate files make up your own mind, this file site is searchable

UPDATE 7 December 2009

Hockey Stick over Time

Throughout the history of the Earth it has been unusual to have one polar ice-cap; it is unique for us now to have two of them.

Yet, in the context of the history of the planet, this is not a normal period.

More average conditions would be significantly warmer, producing lush vegetation and hot conditions - BBC (UK)

more here >>>

  • The Earth is currently in the middle of an ice epoch.
  • Within an ice epoch there are ice ages, which alternate with shorter warmer periods known as interglacials.
  • In Earths history it has been unusual to have one polar ice-cap; it is unique for us now to have two of them.

We are currently in the middle of an ice epoch (longer than an ice age) which has lasted millions of years and is likely to continue for millions more.

Yet, in the context of the history of the planet, this is not a normal period.

More average conditions would be significantly warmer, producing the lush vegetation and hot conditions that prevailed aeons ago, when dinosaurs walked the Earth for millions of years.

The reason why we are in the middle of such a cold epoch has a great deal to do with the positioning of the land masses. Almost imperceptibly, the great continents are constantly moving and changing location.

Throughout the history of the Earth it has been unusual to have one polar ice-cap; it is unique for us now to have two of them.

The Milankovitch model states that variations in the Earth's orbit can account for our weather pattern during the present ice epoch.

The reasons behind what may trigger an ice age, or cause the mini-cycles of optima and little ice ages is likely to be down to a complex combination of factors including the Earth's magnetism.


Well finally the Australian mainstream media is taking notice, and no wonder they didn't want to look. They call it Climate-gate. How about that I wonder were they heard that from ? ;)

Seems Australian scientists are part of the con - very bad indeed seeing the Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd flatly refuses to discuss any of this in public, has refused public debate, and answering public questions, so he can railroad a new mega tax-on-everything to...well he won't tell us what the new tax will do. Thankfully it's an election year in 2010, we can answer him at the only poll that counts, the election, then perhaps jail him for fraud afterwards.

Quit the cover up Kev, we'll find out sooner or later.

Here's what experts say about Australian Weather stats [The Age]

The programmer found the Australian weather data to be riddled with entry errors, duplication and inaccuracies and described as a ''bloody mess'' attempts to homogenise information and entries.

In his text file, the programmer documents his attempts to make sense of the reams of raw historical data that was used by the CRU. He railed that the global information he has to work with has ''no uniform integrity''.

UPDATE 5 December 2009

At last mainstream news is picking up CLIMATEGATE

**** ABC Australia
ELIZABETH JACKSON: Hundreds of pages of correspondence between climate scientists in Britain and America have caused outrage at the United Nations as it prepares for the biggest international gathering in its history.

The University of East Anglia is now being investigated by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change over claims that its leading professors fudged data and suppressed evidence that contradicted its theories on manmade global warming.

Our Europe correspondent Emma Alberici.

EMMA ALBERICI: They're calling it Climategate and it threatens to derail next week's negotiations in Copenhagen.

A string of emails sent from the University of East Anglia's climate research unit, mostly from Professor Phil Jones, who has stood down while the investigation runs its course.

In some of the leaked correspondence Professor Jones is asking for all emails from one certain scientist to be deleted.
In others he's asking for some research papers to be excluded from the UN's next report by its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

But one of the most troubling lines was this one. It reads, “I've just completed Mike's nature trick of adding in the real temperature to each series for the last 20 years and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline”. [see complete email below]

**** There's only about 100 posts so far, compared to 50,000,000 by bloggers. Here's the latest

Things are hotting up.

**** Al's now returned because he looked like a coward and he's under contract to promote his new book called 'Our Choice' perhaps 'Poor Choice' is more appropriate ;) But he won't be doing any public appearances where he could be asked inconvenient questions like how much of this scandal did he know about, it'll be just a safe photo op waving his book in the air while smiling.

**** Palin has called on Obama to boycott Copenhagen in protest because of the Climategate scandal

...and I'm sure there'll be more to come ;)

As MSO readers will know, I'm skeptical about everything lol, I've seen so many scams over the years, I need a lot to convince me of anything.

But this is looking like the real deal and it'll probably trigger another financial collapse in our already stressed world with all the green stocks bombing out.

My advice: Duck and cover.



Al Gore has done a chicken run and pulled out of the Climate fest next week in Copenhagen, where guests have paid $1200 per handshake with big AL. He says it's because of a scheduling problem, we think it's because of over 50,000,000 Climategate posts in just 2 weeks !!!

And the mainstream media still hasn't said anything, not even the word appears. What does that tell us about the mainstream media ? COVER-UP BIG TIME. Why would you trust them again, if they won't tell you about Climategate now?

Why are the mainstream media moguls so shy, why does Google - self proclaimed champion of free speech restrict alerts for Climategate ? They are restricting search results or Bing is a better search engine. Naturally they'd deny both ;)

See for yourself.

Latest search Google CLIMATEGATE 31,000,000

Latest search Bing CLIMATEGATE 51,000,000

3 hours later it's 57,400,000 for Bing and still 31,000,000 for google.


UPDATE 4 December 2009

About 2 weeks ago 1000's of emails and documents from the world authority on climate science in the UK, were released online by an inside whistle-blower, exposing the Global Warming scam.

World leading scientists have been deliberately cooking the books because there is no global warming, the earth has been getting colder. The 'trick' is 'to hide the decline' says one crook to another as they discuss how to commit fraud...and commit it.

The biggest question is why the mainstream media has not said anything about this. It even involves a British Lord and Head science adviser to the UK govt, and the Nobel Peace Prize awarding dodgy science, well not really science at all, just a con job.

Aren't we all supposed to be happy we won't be burnt to a cinder now that Global Warming is a con job, just like the Weapons of Mass Destruction ?

I mean why are they silent ?

In shuffle culture, we encourage people to be informed and make educated decisions about everything. Whether we agree or not afterwards, we are still friends and always shufflers.

I mean, when I buy a computer, I want to know it's capabilities good and bad, because I'll find out easy enough when I get it home and switch it on. So what's the point in lying ? What else is going on ?

Why pretend CLIMATEGATE doesn't exist, why not call out the bad scientists and throw them in jail ? Why not have transparent proper government inquiries into it and help preserve peoples respect in the scientific process?

Why just duck for cover at the first mention of FRAUD hmmmm?

Here is what they don't want you to know...

Here's my source:

Here's the original released files: Link valid at 4 December 2009 65 meg of files, no virus/Trojans, all legit looking text and charts. Freedom Of Information FOI2009

Here's one of crooks emails:

From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,,
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@xxx.xx.xx,

Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or first thing tomorrow.

I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.

Mike’s series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.


Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) xxxxx
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) xxxx
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email

No comments:

Post a Comment